Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported asphalt mixing plant was eligible for exemption under Sl. No. 230 of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. as goods imported for a road project by a person duly covered by the contract structure involving the concessionaire and the sub-contractor.
Analysis: The project was undertaken on a Build-Operate-Transfer basis under a concession agreement between NHAI and CIDBI, with STPL constituted as the Special Purpose Vehicle and vested with the rights and obligations under the assignment agreement. The appellant entered into an EPC contract with STPL, and the record, including the NHAI letter, showed that STPL had awarded the contract to the appellant for execution of the roadworks. In these circumstances, the appellant could not be treated as a mere sub-contractor outside the contractual chain; the reliance on the precedent concerning a different contractual structure was held inapplicable. Following the earlier decision on an identical import, the benefit of the notification was held to be available.
Conclusion: The imported machine was held eligible for exemption under Sl. No. 230 of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus., the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal succeeded in favour of the assessee.