Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Improvement Trusts Qualify for Tax Exemption as Public Utilities</h1> <h3>Hoshiarpur Improvement Trust and Others Versus Income Tax Officer - Ward 1, Hoshiarpur and Others</h3> Hoshiarpur Improvement Trust and Others Versus Income Tax Officer - Ward 1, Hoshiarpur and Others - [2016] 45 ITR (Trib) 682 Issues Involved:1. Whether the activities of the assessees, improvement trusts set up under the Punjab Towns Improvement Trusts Act, 1922, qualify as 'general public utility' under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. Whether the activities of the assessees are in the nature of trade, commerce, or business, and thus not for 'charitable purposes' due to the first proviso to Section 2(15).3. Whether the assessees are entitled to exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.4. The impact of the amendments to Section 2(15) and their applicability to the assessment years in question.Detailed Analysis:1. Nature of Activities and General Public Utility:The primary issue is whether the activities of the assessees, improvement trusts, qualify as 'general public utility' under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal noted that these trusts are set up under the Punjab Towns Improvement Trusts Act, 1922, with the objective of planned development of towns and cities. The activities include acquiring land, developing it, and selling plots and buildings. The Tribunal emphasized that the planned development of cities and towns is an object of general public utility, and this objective has been consistently followed by the assessees in all their activities.2. Activities in the Nature of Trade, Commerce, or Business:The Tribunal examined whether the activities of the assessees are in the nature of trade, commerce, or business, which would disqualify them from being considered as 'charitable purposes' under the first proviso to Section 2(15). The Tribunal highlighted that the mere presence of profit in the activities does not necessarily imply a profit motive. The predominant motivation for the activities is crucial. The Tribunal referred to the CBDT Circular No. 11, which clarifies that activities in the nature of trade, commerce, or business should not be considered charitable if they are undertaken with a profit motive. However, the Tribunal found that the activities of the assessees are carried out with the larger and predominant objective of general public utility, and not with a profit motive.3. Entitlement to Exemption under Section 11:The Tribunal addressed whether the assessees are entitled to exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal noted that the assessees were granted registration as charitable trusts under Section 12AA, and the activities were considered to be for 'general public utility.' The Tribunal found that the activities of the assessees, including the sale of plots and buildings, are carried out in furtherance of the objective of planned development, which qualifies as an object of general public utility. Therefore, the assessees are entitled to exemption under Section 11.4. Impact of Amendments to Section 2(15):The Tribunal discussed the amendments to Section 2(15) and their applicability to the assessment years in question. The Tribunal noted that the amendments brought by the Finance Act, 2015, which introduced a new proviso to Section 2(15), are effective from 1st April 2016 and are not retrospective. The new proviso excludes activities in the nature of trade, commerce, or business from being considered as charitable purposes if the aggregate receipts from such activities exceed twenty percent of the total receipts. The Tribunal concluded that the amendments do not apply to the assessment years under consideration, and the benefit of Section 11 read with Section 2(15) cannot be denied for the periods prior to 1st April 2016.Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the activities of the assessees qualify as 'general public utility' under Section 2(15) and are not in the nature of trade, commerce, or business with a profit motive. Consequently, the assessees are entitled to exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The amendments to Section 2(15) introduced by the Finance Act, 2015, are not applicable to the assessment years in question. The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees and dismissed the appeals of the Assessing Officer.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found