Life insurance computation rules override section 14A, while reassessment stands where escaped income was not earlier examined.

For a life insurance company, reassessment was upheld because the recorded reasons showed escapement of income and the issue of negative reserves had not been examined in the original assessment, so the reopening was not treated as a mere change of opinion. The treatment of negative reserves in computing life insurance profits was not finally sustained and was restored for fresh adjudication in line with the special insurance computation regime and consistency with connected proceedings. Section 14A was held inapplicable to a life insurer governed by the special computation provisions, so the disallowance under that provision was deleted.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether reopening of the assessment was valid under the law governing escaped income and change of opinion; (ii) Whether negative reserves could be added back to the actuarial surplus for computing profits from life insurance business; (iii) Whether section 14A applied to the computation of income of a life insurance company.

Issue (i): Whether reopening of the assessment was valid under the law governing escaped income and change of opinion.

Analysis: The reasons recorded showed escapement of income on the basis of incorrect application of tax rate on non-insurance income and the treatment of negative reserves at nil. The first ground did not survive before the Tribunal, and on the second ground there had been no prior examination of the issue in the original assessment so as to make the reassessment a mere change of opinion.

Conclusion: Reopening was upheld and the issue was decided against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether negative reserves could be added back to the actuarial surplus for computing profits from life insurance business.

Analysis: The computation of income of an insurer is governed by the special scheme applicable to life insurance business, under which actuarial surplus determined in accordance with the insurance law is the starting point. However, the record showed that the matter had already been dealt with in the assessee's own later year and had been restored for fresh adjudication in line with the Tribunal's directions in connected matters. Applying consistency, the same course was followed for the year in question.

Conclusion: The addition was not finally sustained and the issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.

Issue (iii): Whether section 14A applied to the computation of income of a life insurance company.

Analysis: The special computation provisions for insurance business override the general disallowance mechanism under section 14A. Following the view taken in the assessee's own case for a subsequent year and the co-ordinate bench decisions relied upon, section 14A was held inapplicable to life insurance companies governed by the special scheme.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The reassessment survived, the disallowance related to negative reserves was sent back for reconsideration, and the disallowance under section 14A was deleted, leaving the assessee only partly successful.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a life insurance company is assessed under the special computation regime, section 14A does not apply, and reassessment is not barred where the issue was not examined earlier and the recorded reasons disclose escapement of income.

---