CESTAT Chennai: Penalties Upheld for DEPB Mis-declaration | Compliance Deadline & Penalty Waiver

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI found M/s. Umang Overseas, M/s. Narayan Impex, Shri Shiyam Sundar, and Shri Rajiv Arora directly involved in mis-declaration of goods for DEPB benefits, leading to justified penalties. The Tribunal directed specific pre-deposit amounts for each party, with instructions to comply within four weeks. Compliance would result in the waiver of the balance penalties and stay on penalty recovery pending appeal disposal. The judgment emphasized the consequences of non-compliance and provided a structured approach for penalty resolution.

---

---

Issues: Mis-declaration of goods for DEPB benefits, waiver of pre-deposit of penalty

The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI dealt with multiple applications involving the mis-declaration of goods by M/s. Umang Overseas, M/s. Narayan Impex, Shri Shiyam Sundar, and Shri Rajiv Arora to avail undue DEPB benefits. The common issue in these applications was the waiver of pre-deposit of penalties imposed on the applicants. The Tribunal noted that the applicants had exported goods by mis-declaration, which led to a detailed investigation by DRI officers. The applicants sought a waiver of pre-deposit of penalties amounting to significant sums.

Upon reviewing the impugned order, the Tribunal found that the applicants were directly involved in claiming undue DEPB benefits, leading to penalties being imposed. The Tribunal observed prima facie evidence of penalties being justified. Consequently, the Tribunal directed M/s. Umang Overseas and Shri Shiyam Sundar to make pre-deposits of &8377; 4,50,000/- and &8377; 1,00,000/- respectively, while M/s. Narayan Impex and Shri Rajiv Arora were directed to make pre-deposits of &8377; 4,00,000/- and &8377; 1,00,000/- respectively. The applicants were instructed to make these pre-deposits within four weeks and report compliance by a specified date. Upon compliance, the pre-deposit of the balance amount of penalties would be waived, and the recovery of the penalties stayed pending the disposal of the appeals.

In conclusion, the Tribunal's judgment addressed the issue of mis-declaration of goods for DEPB benefits and the subsequent waiver of pre-deposit of penalties for the involved applicants. The decision provided a structured approach for the applicants to comply with the pre-deposit requirements and outlined the consequences of non-compliance and the subsequent waiver of penalties.

---