Section 10B turnover computation and EEFC losses: excluded export turnover items must also leave total turnover, while exchange loss stays set-off eligible.

For section 10B deductions computed by the export-turnover/total-turnover ratio, telecommunication and foreign currency travel expenditure excluded from export turnover must also be excluded from total turnover, applying parity in the formula. The EEFC exchange loss was held outside the section 10B profit computation because it had no direct nexus with export profits, but it remained a normal business loss available for set-off under the Act. The appellate authority's power to direct recomputation of earlier years' deduction was sustained, subject to limitation, and the related challenge based on section 14A did not succeed independently.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether telecommunication and foreign currency travel expenditure reduced from export turnover under section 10B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 must also be reduced from total turnover; (ii) Whether loss on conversion of the EEFC balance into Indian currency is to be excluded from the section 10B computation and treated as a business loss eligible for set-off; (iii) Whether the appellate authority could direct recomputation of deduction under section 10B for earlier years and the related adjustment under section 14A.

Issue (i): Whether telecommunication and foreign currency travel expenditure reduced from export turnover under section 10B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 must also be reduced from total turnover.

Analysis: The deduction under section 10B is computed on the proportion of export turnover to total turnover. The Special Bench view in Sak Soft was followed, applying the parity principle that items excluded from export turnover by definition cannot be retained in total turnover for the same formula. The same treatment was extended to telecommunication and foreign currency expenditure.

Conclusion: In favour of the assessee. Such expenditure, once excluded from export turnover, must also be excluded from total turnover.

Issue (ii): Whether loss on conversion of the EEFC balance into Indian currency is to be excluded from the section 10B computation and treated as a business loss eligible for set-off.

Analysis: The treatment of gain from EEFC account had earlier been held to be outside the section 10B deduction computation because it had no direct nexus with export profits. The same principle was applied to loss. While the loss was to be kept out of the section 10B profit computation, it remained a normal business loss to be dealt with under the Act.

Conclusion: In favour of the assessee. The EEFC loss was excluded from the section 10B computation and allowed to be considered for set-off under the normal provisions.

Issue (iii): Whether the appellate authority could direct recomputation of deduction under section 10B for earlier years and the related adjustment under section 14A.

Analysis: The appellate authority's powers are co-terminus with those of the assessing officer and include power to direct what ought to have been done in the assessment. On that basis, the direction to recompute the earlier years' deduction and withdraw the unintended benefit arising from disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was sustained, subject to limitation. The additional challenge based on section 14A was not accepted independently.

Conclusion: Against the assessee. The direction to recompute for earlier years was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The common order was sustained on the substantive turnover and EEFC issues in favour of the assessee, while the direction for recomputation relating to earlier years was upheld, and both appeals stood dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: For deductions computed by a turnover ratio under section 10B, any expenditure statutorily excluded from export turnover must also be excluded from total turnover, and EEFC gains or losses not directly linked to export profits fall outside the deduction computation but remain subject to the normal provisions of the Act.

---