Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waste products emerging inevitably in the manufacture of dutiable final products attract the requirement of payment under Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.
Analysis: Garnet rejects and gypsum arose as waste products in the process of manufacture of Ilmenite and salt. They were not final products or by-products and their emergence was an inevitable consequence of the manufacturing process. The Board circular relied upon had treated press mud as residual waste and not as a marketable excisable product, and the same principle was applied to these waste products. On that basis, the rule invoked for demanding 8% of the sale price was held inapplicable.
Conclusion: Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was not attracted, and no amount was payable on clearance of the waste products.
Final Conclusion: The common issue was decided in favour of the assessee, resulting in dismissal of the Revenue's challenge and allowance of the connected assessee's appeal with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Waste products that arise inevitably in manufacture and are neither final products nor by-products do not attract the reversal or payment mechanism under Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.