Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under the Wealth-tax Act was to be worked out with reference to the law prevailing on the valuation date or the law prevailing on the date the return was filed.
Analysis: The returns for the relevant assessment years were filed after a long delay, and penalty proceedings were initiated under the Wealth-tax Act. The question was whether the applicable law for determining the quantum of penalty was the law in force on the valuation date or on the date of filing of the return. Following the binding principle applied in prior authority and the Supreme Court decision relied upon, the applicable law was held to be the law prevailing when the return was filed, not the law prevailing on the valuation date.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's view was incorrect. Penalty had to be computed with reference to the law in force on the date of filing of the return, and the answer to the reference was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.