Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether garnet rejects and gypsum, arising as waste products in the manufacture of ilmenite and salt, attracted Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 so as to justify demand of 8% of the sale price on their clearance.
Analysis: The disputed materials emerged inevitably in the course of manufacture as waste or residual products. They were not the final products of the assessee's manufacture, nor were they treated as by-products for the purpose of the rule. On the findings recorded, such waste products did not attract the obligation contemplated by Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. The demand raised on that basis could not be sustained.
Conclusion: Rule 6(3)(b) was held inapplicable to the clearance of garnet rejects and gypsum, and the demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.