Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on steel plates, angles, channels, welding electrodes and storage racks used for fabrication of capital goods and parts and components thereof.
Analysis: The items in dispute were shown by the records to have been used for fabrication of raw mill hopper, belt conveyor systems, transfer tower, boiler parts, grating material and other machinery-related components. The Tribunal noted that the appellant's own earlier order had allowed credit on similar items and that the judicial authorities relied upon by the assessee supported credit where the materials were used for manufacture of components, parts and accessories of capital goods. The contrary authorities cited by Revenue were held to be inapplicable on the facts and in the light of the later judicial position followed by the Tribunal.
Conclusion: CENVAT credit on the disputed steel items, welding electrodes and storage racks was admissible, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.