Exemption notification coverage controls entitlement, and a disputed tariff heading need not be decided when applicability is clear.

The exemption notification was held to apply because it expressly covered the relevant product for the material period and referred to goods under Heading 87.02, 87.03 or 87.04. On that basis, the assessee was entitled to the exemption, and the disputed classification between Heading 87.02 and Heading 87.07 did not require separate adjudication. The operative principle is that where an exemption notification clearly covers the goods for the relevant period, the exemption can be granted without first deciding the exact tariff heading dispute.

---

---

Issues: Whether the respondent assessee was entitled to the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 27/2002-CE(NT) dated 23.7.2002, and whether it was necessary to decide the exact chapter heading classification of the product.

Analysis: The notification expressly covered the relevant product for the stated period and referred to goods falling under Heading 87.02, 87.03 or 87.04, rather than Heading 87.07. In that situation, the precise controversy about whether the product fell under Heading 87.02 or 87.07 did not require adjudication for deciding the exemption claim.

Conclusion: The respondent assessee was entitled to the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 27/2002-CE(NT), and the classification issue was left unnecessary for decision.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification specifically covers the goods for the relevant period and its applicability is clear, the assessee is entitled to the exemption without a separate determination of the disputed tariff heading.

---