1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court dismissed the appeal due to a duty impact of rupees two lakhs only.</h1> Supreme Court dismissed the appeal due to a duty impact of rupees two lakhs only. - 2015 (320) E.L.T. A107 (SC) Duty demand - Manufacturing activity - slitting of crape paper for making masking tape - Supreme Court declined to entertain the appeal as the duty impact is less than βΉ 2 lakhs. Appeal was filed by the Revenue against the decision of Tribunal [2003 (6) TMI 407 - CESTAT, MUMBAI], wherein Tribunal held that It is nowhere stated in the chapter sub-heading classifying the paper on the basis of the dimension of it namely width of the paper. Note 10(a) of the Chapter 48 mentions that process of slitting or cutting shall amount to manufacture in respect of thermal paper. Here admittedly imported material is not thermal paper. The show cause notice does not state that the product is of thermal paper. In the absence of such a claim in the show cause notice the entire action of department treating the activity is wrong. Supreme Court dismissed the appeal due to a duty impact of rupees two lakhs only.