Tribunal directs review of Transfer Pricing, allows appeal with specific instructions.

The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer to recompute the Arm's Length Price by excluding certain comparable companies and accepted the alternative computation of deduction under Section 10A. The appeal was partly allowed, with specific directions to the Assessing Officer and Transfer Pricing Officer.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Adjustment to Arm's Length Price (ALP)
2. Exclusion of Comparable Companies
3. Method of Computation of Deduction under Section 10A
4. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for Non-Deduction of TDS

Detailed Analysis:

1. Adjustment to Arm's Length Price (ALP):

The assessee rendered software development services to its associated enterprise (AE) and claimed that the transaction price was at arm's length, supported by a report under section 92E using the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM). The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) selected 20 comparable companies and determined an adjusted arithmetic mean PLI of 19.06%, resulting in an ALP adjustment of Rs. 1,56,54,745. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) confirmed the adjustment, leading the assessee to appeal.

2. Exclusion of Comparable Companies:

The Tribunal considered the exclusion of certain comparable companies based on turnover and functional dissimilarity:
- Turnover Filter: Companies with a turnover exceeding Rs. 200 crores were excluded, following the Tribunal's decision in the case of Trilogy E-Business Software India Pvt. Ltd. and others. The excluded companies were Flextronics Software Systems Ltd., iGate Global Solutions Ltd., Mindtree Ltd., Persistent Systems Ltd., Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd., Infosys Technologies Ltd., and Tata Elxsi Ltd.
- Functional Dissimilarity: KALS Information Systems Ltd. and Lucid Software Ltd. were excluded due to their involvement in software products and training rather than pure software development services. Avani Cincom Technologies Ltd., Celestial Biolabs Ltd., E-Zest Solutions Ltd., Thirdware Solutions Ltd., and Softsol India Ltd. were also excluded based on similar grounds, including functional differences and related party transactions.

3. Method of Computation of Deduction under Section 10A:

The assessee claimed a deduction under section 10A, but the Assessing Officer excluded telecommunication and foreign travel expenses from the export turnover. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to exclude these expenses from both export turnover and total turnover, in line with the Karnataka High Court's decision in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd.

4. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for Non-Deduction of TDS:

The assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs. 23,47,709 paid to a non-resident without TDS, claiming it was a reimbursement. The Tribunal dismissed this ground as the assessee did not raise objections before the DRP, and the issue was not considered by the DRP under section 144C(8).

Conclusion:

The Tribunal directed the TPO to recompute the ALP by excluding the specified comparable companies and accepted the alternative prayer regarding the computation of deduction under section 10A. The appeal was partly allowed, with specific directions to the Assessing Officer and TPO.

---