TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Orders Authority to Decide on Petitioner's Request, Maintains Interim Order</h1> <h3>FI-DESIGHN & DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED, Versus STATE OF KERALA</h3> The High Court directed the designated authority to pass orders on the petitioner's clarification within 4 weeks, maintaining the interim order preventing ... Applicability of Act – Imposition of Penalty – Case of petitioner is that in spite of fact that transaction between Petitioner and 4th respondent, is covered by CST Act, 4th respondent deducted tax due under Kerala Value added Tax Act from their bills – Petitioner sought for clarification however while orders are awaited, petitioner apprehended that 4th respondent would deposit tax deducted to Commercial Taxes Department – Held that:- Taking note of pendency of clarification sought, court directed designated authority to pass orders on Ext.P6 – Meanwhile, interim order directing 4th respondent not to deposit tax deducted from petitioner will continue – Petition Disposed of. The petitioner, a dealer registered under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, filed a writ petition stating that the 4th respondent deducted tax under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act from their bills despite the transaction being covered by the CST Act. The High Court directed the designated authority to pass orders on the petitioner's clarification within 4 weeks, maintaining the interim order preventing the 4th respondent from depositing the deducted tax.
TaxTMI 
