Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeals required remand to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication in view of the conclusions already recorded on the taxability issue.
Analysis: The order records the earlier binding conclusions that the joint development arrangement did not attract Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 so as to bring the transaction within Section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and that the assessee could not be fastened with capital gains tax on the remaining land on the basis adopted below. On that footing, the matter was sent back to the Tribunal to pass fresh orders after hearing the parties and in light of those conclusions.
Conclusion: The appeals were remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision in accordance with the earlier conclusions.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the controlling tax issue has already been decided in an earlier binding judgment, the appropriate course is to remand the matter for fresh orders consistent with that decision.