Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand of customs duty warranted remand for reconsideration of the appellants' claim under Notification No. 65/88-Cus when the benefit of Notification No. 64/88-Cus was no longer being pressed.
Analysis: The claim under Notification No. 64/88-Cus was not pursued, and the alternative claim under Notification No. 65/88-Cus had been raised before the adjudicating authority but was not examined. Since the duty liability under Notification No. 65/88-Cus had to be worked out separately, the matter required fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority after deposit of the quantified amount and after granting an opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for reconsideration of eligibility under Notification No. 65/88-Cus, subject to deposit of the specified amount.