TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal allows interest claim on house property, upholds profit estimation at 8%, disallows depreciation</h1> <h3>Sri Ram Prasad Bhatta Versus ACIT, Berhampur Circle, Berhampur.</h3> Sri Ram Prasad Bhatta Versus ACIT, Berhampur Circle, Berhampur. - TMI Issues:1. Estimation of profit at 8% of gross receipts by AO.2. Disallowance of depreciation on estimated profit.3. Disallowance of deduction u/s. 24(b) of the Income Tax Act.Analysis:1. The appeal was against the order of the ld. CIT (A) confirming the AO's estimation of profit at 8% of gross receipts, despite audited accounts under section 44AB. The assessee argued that the profit estimation was on the higher side. However, as the assessee failed to produce necessary documents, the AO rejected the books and estimated profit at 8%. The Tribunal upheld this decision citing Section 44AD of the Income Tax Act, which allows for such estimation if books are not maintained, especially when gross receipts exceed Rs. 1 crore. The Tribunal found the rate reasonable and in line with precedents, dismissing the appeal.2. The second issue pertained to the disallowance of depreciation on the estimated profit. The AR cited judgments supporting depreciation allowance on estimated income, emphasizing the need for deductions as per relevant sections of the Act. The DR supported the revenue authorities' decisions. The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not provide evidence to support the claim, leading to the disallowance. Referring to Section 144 of the Act, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of depreciation due to lack of compliance and failure to produce necessary documentation.3. The final issue involved the disallowance of interest on house property claim under section 80C. The assessee failed to provide evidence to support the claim, resulting in disallowance by the AO and confirmation by the CIT (A). However, during the appeal, the assessee submitted a bank statement showing interest payments, which the Tribunal accepted as valid. The Tribunal allowed the claim for interest paid on the house property, supported by the bank statement.In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, permitting the interest claim on the house property but upholding the estimation of profit at 8% and disallowance of depreciation due to non-compliance and lack of evidence.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
