1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal dismissed as Tribunal's decision upheld, no interference needed.</h1> The SC dismissed an appeal where the Tribunal remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, finding no need for interference. - 2015 (320) E.L.T. A336 (SC) Exemption benefit of Notification No. 64/88-Cus. - Demand, Confiscation and Penalty - Tribunal vide impugned order 2003 (10) TMI 153 - CESTAT, MUMBAI set aside order of Commissioner denying benefit of Notification No. 64/88-Cus. as well as ordering confiscation of imported goods and instead remanded matter back to commissioner for re-consideration - Supreme court held that tribunal had only remanded matter back to Commissioner for fresh adjudication - In said circumstances no interference was called for. The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal where the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication. No interference was deemed necessary.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
