Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Appeal dismissed as Tribunal's decision upheld, no interference needed.</h1> <h3>Commissioner Versus Jaslok Hospital & Research Centre</h3> The SC dismissed an appeal where the Tribunal remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, finding no need for interference. - Commissioner Versus Jaslok ... Exemption benefit of Notification No. 64/88-Cus. - Demand, Confiscation and Penalty - Tribunal vide impugned order 2003 (10) TMI 153 - CESTAT, MUMBAI set aside order of Commissioner denying benefit of Notification No. 64/88-Cus. as well as ordering confiscation of imported goods and instead remanded matter back to commissioner for re-consideration - Supreme court held that tribunal had only remanded matter back to Commissioner for fresh adjudication - In said circumstances no interference was called for. The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal where the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication. No interference was deemed necessary.