Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Select multiple courts at once.
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal due to a tax effect of Rs. 4,22,830.</h1> The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal due to a tax effect of Rs. 4,22,830. - [2015] 373 ITR 49 (SC) Entertainment of appeal - tax effect as criterion for admissibility of appeal - dismissal of appeal on preliminary threshold groundEntertainment of appeal - tax effect as criterion for admissibility of appeal - Whether the appeal should be entertained where the tax effect is Rs. 4,22,830. - HELD THAT: - The Court recorded that the tax effect in the present case is Rs. 4,22,830 and, on that ground alone, declined to entertain the appeal. No adjudication on the merits was undertaken; the matter was disposed of by refusing admission of the appeal on the basis of the quantified tax effect being the determinative threshold ground for non-entertainment.The appeal was refused entertainment and dismissed without deciding the merits.Final Conclusion: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal solely on the preliminary ground that the tax effect was Rs. 4,22,830 and therefore declined to entertain the appeal, leaving the merits undecided. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal due to a tax effect of Rs. 4,22,830.