Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether printed PVC film carrying logos, trademarks or designs is classifiable under Chapter 49 as a product of printing industry or under Chapter 39 as printed plastic goods.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the printing on duty-paid PVC film was merely incidental to its use as wrapper material or whether the product, by reason of the printing, became a product of the printing industry. The earlier Tribunal decision in Srikumar Agencies, read with the Supreme Court ruling in Holostick India Ltd., was applied as governing authority on identical classification principles. The reasoning accepted that where printing is not merely incidental and the goods are intended to be used as printed matter, Chapter 49 becomes applicable. Section Note 2 of Section VII was also understood as excluding products of the printing industry from Chapter 39.
Conclusion: The printed PVC film is classifiable under Chapter 490190 and not under Chapter 3920.39.
Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the Department was unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to relief in the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Printed plastic film is classifiable as a product of printing industry under Chapter 49 where the printing gives the goods their relevant character and is not merely incidental to their primary use.