1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Interpretation of gains from contract cancellation under section 80HHC upheld</h1> The High Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's decision regarding the interpretation of gains from cancellation of contracts under section 80HHC. Citing ... Gains out of cancellation of contracts - whether were income from export business and eligible for deduction u/s. 80HHC? - Held that:- Tribunal right in holding that the Gains out of cancellation of contracts were income from export business and eligible for deduction u/s. 80HHC. See Commissioner of Incometax-I vs. Friends and Friends Shipping Pvt. Ltd. [2013 (5) TMI 458 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] and Commissioner of Income Tax V. Mitsu Limited [2014 (4) TMI 168 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT], CIT v. Badridas Gauridu (P) Ltd. [2003 (1) TMI 61 - BOMBAY High Court] and CIT v. Soorajmull Nagarmull (1980 (9) TMI 69 - CALCUTTA High Court) with Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. Panchmahal Steel Ltd. [2013 (5) TMI 686 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] - Decided in favour of assessee. Issues:Interpretation of section 80HHC for gains from cancellation of contracts.Analysis:The High Court considered the substantial question of law framed in the appeal regarding gains from cancellation of contracts and their eligibility for deduction under section 80HHC. The Court noted that similar issues had been considered in previous cases, including Commissioner of Incometax-I vs. Friends and Friends Shipping Pvt. Ltd. and Commissioner of Income Tax V. Mitsu Limited. The Court followed the decisions of CIT v. Badridas Gauridu and CIT v. Soorajmull Nagarmull, as well as the order in Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. Panchmahal Steel Ltd. The Court found that the question in the present appeal was already covered by the previous decisions.The Court concluded that the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal did not require any interference. Therefore, the substantial question of law was decided against the revenue and in favor of the assessee. As a result, the Court dismissed the present appeal without any order as to costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
