Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the absence of an express machinery provision, assessment proceedings under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 could continue against the legal representatives of a sole proprietor after his death.
Analysis: The statutory scheme of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and the Central Excise Rules, 1944 showed that the term "assessee" referred to a living person liable to pay excise duty, with no provision analogous to the Income-tax Act enabling continuation of assessment proceedings against the estate or legal representatives of a deceased person. Section 11 dealt only with recovery of sums already payable, and could not supply the missing machinery for assessment. The comparison with the Income-tax Act, 1922 and the Income-tax Act, 1961 demonstrated that where Parliament intended assessment to continue after death, it enacted specific provisions such as Section 24B and Sections 159 and 168. In a taxing statute, nothing can be read in or implied to create liability where the statute does not clearly provide for it.
Conclusion: The proceedings against the legal representatives could not be continued under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and the assessment against them was without jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi: In a taxing statute, the liability of a deceased person's estate or legal representatives cannot be enforced unless the statute contains a clear charging provision and an express machinery provision authorising assessment or recovery against them.