Tribunal allows appeal, deletes additions by AO for insurance premium, interest, bank deposits.

The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting all additions made by the AO related to insurance premium, interest on deposits, and bank account deposits. The tribunal found the explanations provided by the assessee reasonable and concluded that the additions were not justified during the block assessment period.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Addition of Rs. 3,107 for payment of insurance premium.
2. Addition of Rs. 74,093 for interest on deposit with M/s. Sanjay Textiles, Kanpur.
3. Addition of Rs. 1,58,810 for deposit in SB A/c. No. 1863 with Allahabad Bank.
4. Addition of Rs. 2,16,843 for deposit in SB A/c. No. 709 with United Mercantile Cooperative Bank Ltd.
5. Definition of "undisclosed income" under Section 158BB of the Income Tax Act.
6. Justification of additions in the block assessment period.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Addition of Rs. 3,107 for Payment of Insurance Premium:
The assessee contended that the insurance premium payment of Rs. 3,107 was for Truck No. UP78B 1033, which belonged to his nephew, Shri Rakesh Kumar Chopra. The receipt was mistakenly in the assessee's name. This was clarified by the RTO's office. The tribunal accepted this explanation, noting that it is not unusual to find a relative's receipt at the assessee's place. The addition was deleted.

2. Addition of Rs. 74,093 for Interest on Deposit with M/s. Sanjay Textiles, Kanpur:
The assessee argued that the deposit belonged to his wife, Suman Bala Chopra, and not to him. The tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer (AO) invoked Section 64 without specifying which clause applied. The tribunal found no evidence that the deposit was transferred by the assessee to his wife without adequate consideration. It was also noted that the interest income was below the taxable limit during the relevant period. The tribunal concluded that Section 64 was not applicable and deleted the addition.

3. Addition of Rs. 1,58,810 for Deposit in SB A/c. No. 1863 with Allahabad Bank:
The assessee claimed that the deposits represented receipts from truck plying business, which were regularly withdrawn for expenses. The tribunal examined the original returns and found that the assessee had disclosed income from truck plying under Section 44AE. The AO had added the total deposits without considering the expenses. The tribunal noted that the AO's suspicion of unaccounted money was not supported by evidence. The addition was deleted.

4. Addition of Rs. 2,16,843 for Deposit in SB A/c. No. 709 with United Mercantile Cooperative Bank Ltd:
Similar to the previous issue, the assessee argued that these deposits were also from the truck plying business. The tribunal found that the assessee had disclosed substantial income from truck plying in the original returns. The AO had not provided evidence of additional trucks or unaccounted money. The tribunal deleted the addition, noting that the total deposits were already accounted for in the disclosed income.

5. Definition of "Undisclosed Income" under Section 158BB:
The assessee argued that none of the additions fell under the definition of "undisclosed income" as per Section 158BB. The tribunal did not need to examine this technical objection in detail, as the additions were found unjustified on merits.

6. Justification of Additions in the Block Assessment Period:
The tribunal noted that the AO had not found any adverse material during the search to justify the additions. The disclosed income from the truck plying business was substantial and covered the deposits in question. The tribunal concluded that the additions were not justified and deleted them.

Conclusion:
The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting all the additions made by the AO. The order was pronounced in the open court.

---