TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether transfer of land took place in the earlier previous year under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 where there was a written agreement and delivery of possession; (ii) whether oral arrangements without a written contract could constitute transfer under section 2(47)(v); and (iii) whether the respondent could raise fresh legal grounds before the Tribunal under Rule 27 of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 and, if so, the consequence for the matter.
Issue (i): whether transfer of land took place in the earlier previous year under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 where there was a written agreement and delivery of possession.
Analysis: A written irrevocable agreement of sale coupled with handing over of possession in part performance satisfied the statutory conditions of section 2(47)(v) as read with section 53A. Once the transferee had taken possession under the contract, the transfer was complete for capital gains purposes in the earlier year, regardless of later execution of the sale deed or payment of consideration.
Conclusion: The transfer was held to have occurred in the earlier previous year, and the capital gains relating to those lands were not taxable in the year under consideration.
Issue (ii): whether oral arrangements without a written contract could constitute transfer under section 2(47)(v).
Analysis: Section 53A requires a contract for transfer of immovable property to be in writing and signed, with ascertainable terms. In the absence of such a written contract, mere oral understanding and delivery of possession did not satisfy the statutory requirement for transfer by part performance.
Conclusion: No transfer under section 2(47)(v) was held to have taken place on the basis of the oral arrangements, and the corresponding issue was sent back for fresh examination.
Issue (iii): whether the respondent could raise fresh legal grounds before the Tribunal under Rule 27 of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 and, if so, the consequence for the matter.
Analysis: The respondent was permitted to support the order on additional legal grounds not urged earlier, since the Tribunal has wide powers and a respondent is not precluded from raising grounds available on the record. As the new contention had not been examined by the lower authorities, the proper course was remand for limited reconsideration.
Conclusion: The additional grounds were admitted, and the matter on that aspect was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded only in part. The capital gains additions relating to lands covered by a written agreement and possession handed over were not sustainable, while the disputes concerning lands allegedly transferred only through oral arrangements required fresh adjudication.
Ratio Decidendi: For section 2(47)(v) to apply through section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, a written contract enabling ascertainment of transfer terms and delivery of possession in part performance are essential; absent a written contract, oral arrangements do not effect such transfer, and a respondent may raise additional legal grounds before the Tribunal under Rule 27 if the material is already on record.
TaxTMI 
