Service tax refund claim denied for overseas agent payment under reverse charge mechanism. Lack of representation led to dismissal.

The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the appellant's refund claim for service tax paid to an overseas agent under the reverse charge mechanism for export of goods. It was determined that the service received in India for business purposes was taxable under Section 66A. The appellant's lack of representation during the hearing led to the dismissal of the appeal, affirming the decision of the lower authorities to reject the refund claim for service tax paid after 19.4.2006.

---

---

Issues:
Refund claim rejection based on service tax paid to overseas commission agent under reverse charge mechanism for export of goods.

Analysis:
The appellant filed refund claims for service tax paid on commission to overseas agent under reverse charge mechanism for export of goods. Original authority partially approved the claim. Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal leading to the current appeal. No representation by the appellant was made during the hearing. The Revenue argued that the service falls under Section 66A as service received in India for business use. The Tribunal analyzed the service tax rules and found that the service provided by the overseas agent was received in India by the appellant for export business, making it taxable under Section 66A. The Tribunal agreed with the lower authorities' decision to reject the refund claim for service tax paid after 19.4.2006. Therefore, the impugned order was upheld, and the appellant's appeal was dismissed.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal affirmed that the service provided by the overseas agent to the appellant, received in India for business purposes, was subject to service tax under Section 66A. The appellant's refund claim for service tax paid after 19.4.2006 was rightly rejected by the lower authorities. The appeal was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld.

---