TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether expenditure incurred in connection with fictitious transactions and irregularities was allowable as a business deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. (ii) Whether expenditure incurred for the appointment of a managing director, reconstruction of the board of directors, and reorganisation of business affairs was allowable as a business deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Issue (i): Whether expenditure incurred in connection with fictitious transactions and irregularities was allowable as a business deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: Expenditure connected with irregular or fictitious transactions is not expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business. Amounts spent to deal with consequences of such transactions do not retain the character of legitimate revenue expenditure merely because they were claimed as protecting the business or its goodwill.
Conclusion: The expenditure attributable to fictitious transactions and irregularities was not allowable as a deduction.
Issue (ii): Whether expenditure incurred for the appointment of a managing director, reconstruction of the board of directors, and reorganisation of business affairs was allowable as a business deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: Expenses incurred for bona fide reorganisation measures aimed at continuing the business, including appointment of management and reconstruction of the board, stand on a different footing from expenses linked to irregular transactions. Such expenses may qualify as revenue expenditure if they are shown to have been incurred for the business and not for disallowed irregularity-related outgoings.
Conclusion: The expenses relating to appointment of the managing director, reconstruction of the board, and similar reorganisation matters were to be allowed.
Final Conclusion: The matter was sent back for ascertainment of the exact nature of the solicitors' bills so that only the disallowable items connected with fictitious transactions and irregularities would be excluded and the remaining business-related expenses would be allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure is deductible only when it is wholly and exclusively incurred for the purposes of the business, and expenses linked to fictitious or irregular transactions are not deductible, whereas bona fide reorganisation expenses incurred to conduct the business may be allowable.
TaxTMI 
