Hire-purchase receipts are not interest on loans and advances, so genuine hire charges escape interest tax.

Hire charges received under a genuine hire-purchase agreement were not interest on loans and advances for purposes of the Interest Tax Act. A true hire-purchase arrangement is a composite transaction in which ownership remains with the owner until the option to purchase is exercised, and the hirer is under no legal obligation to buy; the Court held that nomenclature, book entries, and accounting treatment are not decisive. The Tribunal had erred in treating the arrangement as a financing transaction by overlooking the legal distinction between hire-purchase and a loan, so the receipts were not liable to interest tax.

---

---

Issues: Whether hire charges received under a genuine hire-purchase agreement are chargeable to interest tax as interest on loans and advances.

Analysis: The charge under the Interest Tax Act applies to interest on loans and advances. A genuine hire-purchase arrangement is a composite transaction involving hiring with an option to purchase, and the hirer is not under a legal obligation to buy. The Court examined the agreement, the accounting treatment, and the CBDT circulars, and held that the nomenclature or book entry is not decisive. It found that the Tribunal had wrongly treated the transaction as a financing arrangement by relying on the assessee's accounting treatment and by overlooking the legal distinction between a hire-purchase transaction and a loan transaction. The Court relied on the settled distinction that in a true hire-purchase transaction ownership remains with the owner until the option is exercised, whereas a loan transaction involves money advanced for purchase.

Conclusion: Hire charges received under the hire-purchase agreement were not interest within the meaning of the Interest Tax Act and were not liable to interest tax.

---