Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the storage racks assembled and welded at site, and embedded to earth for use in clients' premises, constituted excisable goods or immovable property not liable to central excise duty.
Analysis: The racks were fabricated in components, brought to site, welded and embedded to earth only upon installation. The record did not show clearance of completed racks as movable goods or any intention to evade duty by piecemeal removal. The adjudication had not effectively rebutted the contention that the racks came into existence as a fixed structure only after erection at site. Since dismantling would cause damage and the racks were intended to remain inseparable from the earth, the activity resulted in immovable property rather than movable excisable goods.
Conclusion: The racks were not liable to central excise duty, and the appellant's liability was negatived.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed, and consequential relief was left to be worked out in accordance with law, subject to verification.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods that become embedded to earth and acquire the character of immovable property upon erection at site do not constitute excisable goods liable to central excise duty.