Pre-deposit waiver and remand for merits review where the SIM card dispute was already covered by earlier Tribunal decisions.

The Tribunal held that an appeal should not be dismissed solely for alleged non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction where the underlying dispute required adjudication on merits. Noting that the controversy over sale and purchase of SIM cards was already covered by earlier Tribunal decisions, it granted waiver of pre-deposit and remitted the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh decision on merits without insisting on deposit.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeal could be rejected for non-compliance with the pre-deposit order and whether waiver of pre-deposit ought to be granted with a remand for decision on merits.

Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) had rejected the appeal only for alleged non-compliance with the stay order directing deposit of the entire service tax. It further noted that the dispute regarding sale and purchase of SIM cards was covered by earlier Tribunal decisions, and therefore the controversy required consideration on merits rather than dismissal for non-deposit.

Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and the matter was remitted to the Commissioner (Appeals) for decision on merits without insisting on any pre-deposit.

---