Tribunal sets aside service tax demand on repair work in composite agreement, upholds deduction for goods supplied.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the service tax demand for repair work under a composite agreement. The appellant's entitlement to deduction for the value of goods supplied during repair was upheld, based on legal principles deeming goods sold in works contracts as not subject to service tax. The Tribunal found the demand invalid as it was assessed on the non-excludable value of goods, emphasizing the appellant's compliance with VAT payment on materials supplied and exemption eligibility due to non-availment of cenvat credit on goods.

---

---

Issues:
Service tax demand confirmation for repair work including replacement items under a composite agreement; Exemption under Notification No. 12/2003-ST; VAT payment on materials supplied; Interpretation of contract terms; Applicability of service tax on total repair package; Legal validity of adjudicating authority's observations; Deemed sale of goods in works contract; Deduction of value of goods supplied during repair; Assessment of demand based on value of goods.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed against the confirmation of a service tax demand for repair work, including replacement items, under a composite agreement. The appellant paid service tax on labor charges but not on the entire repair cost. The adjudicating authority denied exemption under Notification No. 12/2003-ST due to the absence of specific clauses in the contract specifying the value of replaced items. The appellant argued that the contract clearly mentioned the value of materials supplied, VAT was paid, and they were entitled to exemption as they did not avail cenvat credit on goods.

The Tribunal reviewed invoices and contract terms, finding that the appellant clearly indicated the value of goods separately in invoices and the contract specified the value of labor charges and replaced items. The Tribunal disagreed with the adjudicating authority's observation, citing legal precedents where goods used during repair were deemed sold in works contracts. Referring to a previous case, the Tribunal held that goods deemed sold during repair were not subject to service tax. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that the appellant was entitled to deduct the value of goods supplied during repair, rendering the demand invalid as it was based on the non-excludable value of goods.

In conclusion, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing that the appellant was entitled to deduction for the value of goods supplied during repair work. The decision was based on the legal principle that goods deemed sold in works contracts were not subject to service tax, leading to the allowance of the appeal and invalidation of the demand based on the value of goods.

---