Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (6) TMI 392 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appeal allowed for assessee, Revenue's appeal dismissed. Tribunal upholds decisions on depreciation, additions, expenses, and losses. The appeal was partly allowed for the assessee, with the Revenue's appeal being dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions on various grounds, ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Appeal allowed for assessee, Revenue's appeal dismissed. Tribunal upholds decisions on depreciation, additions, expenses, and losses.

                            The appeal was partly allowed for the assessee, with the Revenue's appeal being dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions on various grounds, including allowing depreciation on non-compete fees, deleting additions based on the Shreyas S. Morakhia case, and disallowing expenses under section 14A. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed with treating Vanda and trading losses as business losses rather than speculative losses.




                            Issues Involved:

                            1. Depreciation on BSE Membership Card
                            2. Disallowance of Advances for Customizing Software
                            3. Non-Compete Fees as Capital Expenditure
                            4. Deletion of Additions by CIT(A) Based on Shreyas S. Morakhia Case
                            5. Vanda Loss and Trading Loss as Speculative Loss
                            6. Depreciation on Non-Compete Fees
                            7. Disallowance of Expenses under Section 14A

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Depreciation on BSE Membership Card:
                            The assessee's claim for depreciation on the BSE Membership Card amounting to Rs. 24,20,059/- was dismissed. The decision was based on the Hon'ble Bombay High Court ruling in CIT vs. Techno Shares and Stock Ltd., which held that depreciation is not allowable on the BSE Membership Card as it does not fall under any categories specified in section 32(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

                            2. Disallowance of Advances for Customizing Software:
                            The assessee did not press this ground during the hearing, leading to its dismissal.

                            3. Non-Compete Fees as Capital Expenditure:
                            The assessee paid non-compete fees to various parties totaling Rs. 26,62,000/-. The AO treated this expenditure as capital expenditure. The CIT(A) allowed depreciation on this amount, treating the non-compete right as a commercial right eligible for depreciation. The Tribunal upheld this decision, referencing cases such as Real Image Tech Pvt. Ltd. and Medicon Technologies Ltd., which recognized non-compete rights as intangible assets eligible for depreciation.

                            4. Deletion of Additions by CIT(A) Based on Shreyas S. Morakhia Case:
                            The CIT(A) deleted the additions amounting to Rs. 1,20,25,288/- based on the decision in Shreyas S. Morakhia, which was upheld by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s decision, thus dismissing the Revenue's ground.

                            5. Vanda Loss and Trading Loss as Speculative Loss:
                            The AO treated a loss of Rs. 2,32,77,523/- as speculative under section 73 of the Act. The CIT(A) allowed this loss as a business loss, considering the nature of the assessee's extensive stock broking business and the possibility of errors in client transactions. The Tribunal upheld this view, referencing similar decisions in cases like IDFC SSKI Securities Ltd. and Parker Securities Ltd., which treated such losses as business losses, not speculative losses.

                            6. Depreciation on Non-Compete Fees:
                            The CIT(A) allowed depreciation on non-compete fees, treating them as intangible assets. The Tribunal upheld this decision, agreeing with the CIT(A) and referencing supportive case laws. The Revenue's contention that non-compete fees should not be depreciated was dismissed.

                            7. Disallowance of Expenses under Section 14A:
                            The AO disallowed Rs. 36,14,810/- under Rule 8D for expenses related to earning exempt income. The CIT(A), following the Bombay High Court decision in Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., held that Rule 8D was not applicable for the assessment year 2007-08 and directed the AO to make a reasonable disallowance under section 14A. The Tribunal found no infirmity in this direction and upheld the CIT(A)'s decision.

                            Conclusion:
                            The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed, and the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions on most grounds, including the treatment of non-compete fees, the deletion of additions based on the Shreyas S. Morakhia case, and the disallowance under section 14A. The Tribunal also agreed with the CIT(A) on treating Vanda and trading losses as business losses, not speculative losses.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found