TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether loss arising from purchase and sale of shares of other companies was to be treated as speculative loss under Explanation to section 73 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether the allocation of expenditure against speculation income required interference.
Issue (i): Whether loss arising from purchase and sale of shares of other companies was to be treated as speculative loss under Explanation to section 73 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The Explanation deems a company, other than one falling within the excluded categories, to be carrying on speculation business to the extent its business consists of purchase and sale of shares. For deciding applicability, the gross total income relevant to section 73 is to be worked out by considering the positive constituents of income and not by allowing the share-trading loss to neutralise the comparison. The loss on share trading, being negative income, cannot be allowed to defeat the statutory test of whether the company is mainly covered by the specified heads of income. On the admitted figures, the company's principal source of income remained business income and the specified heads did not constitute the main component of gross total income.
Conclusion: The share-trading loss was correctly treated as speculative loss and the finding was against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the allocation of expenditure against speculation income required interference.
Analysis: The basis of allocation made by the Assessing Officer was found to be disclosed in the assessment order, and no infirmity in the apportionment was demonstrated. The adjustment was also reflected in the final computation of speculation loss, and no separate challenge was made to the related dividend and expenditure treatment.
Conclusion: The allocation of expenditure was upheld and the finding was against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The substantive additions and treatment made in assessment were sustained, and the appeal failed in entirety.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of section 73, the gross total income relevant to the statutory comparison is to be determined on the basis of positive income components, and a share-trading loss cannot be used to negate the application of the deeming provision where the company is otherwise not mainly covered by the excluded categories.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
