Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the delay in filing the revision petitions under section 33A(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 was liable to be condoned on the facts of the case.
Analysis: The revision petitions were filed while the excess profits tax proceedings arising from the reopened assessments were still being pursued through the appellate hierarchy. The delay was not attributable to mere inaction, since the petitions were moved after the revised assessment orders had been made and the assessee had exhausted the statutory remedies available under the excess profits tax law. The pendency of those proceedings constituted a sufficient cause for not moving the revisional applications earlier. The view that the assessee ought to have applied for revision immediately upon the reopening notices was rejected as unsustainable.
Conclusion: The refusal to condone delay was set aside and the question of condonation was required to be reconsidered afresh by the Commissioner.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded to the extent that the impugned order was quashed and the matter was sent back for fresh consideration of condonation of delay.
Ratio Decidendi: Delay in filing a revision petition may be condoned where the assessee shows sufficient cause arising from pending statutory proceedings that reasonably prevented earlier recourse to revision.