Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery was justified when the disputed service tax demand was prima facie covered by the Board's circular on inter-connectivity charges between internet service providers.
Analysis: The demand arose from amounts received for inter-connectivity services rendered by one internet service provider to another. The Board's circular clarified that interconnection charges paid by one ISP to another ISP are not liable to service tax, and that service tax is payable only on the amount charged from the ultimate customer receiving online information and database access or retrieval service. On that basis, the Tribunal found that the adjudicating authority could not disregard the circular and that the appellant had made out a prima facie case for interim relief.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in favour of the appellant.