Tribunal Allows Deduction for Bad Debts, Upholds Disallowance of Salary Arrears

The Tribunal allowed the deduction under Section 36(1)(viia) for bad and doubtful debts, remanding the issue back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination. The disallowance of salary arrears was upheld, confirming the Assessing Officer's decision. The Revenue's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, while the assessee's appeal was dismissed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deduction of Rs. 9,93,40,015 on account of provision for bad and doubtful debts under Section 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Disallowance of Rs. 12,73,60,121 on account of salary arrears.

Issue 1: Deduction of Rs. 9,93,40,015 on Account of Provision for Bad and Doubtful Debts

Background:
The assessee, a Regional Rural Bank, claimed a deduction of Rs. 9,93,40,015 under Section 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was initially allowed by the Assessing Officer. However, the learned Commissioner revised the assessment order, directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine the claim, which was subsequently disallowed.

Revenue's Grounds of Appeal:
1. The CIT(A) erred in law and facts.
2. Misinterpretation of the Supreme Court decision in Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. vs. CIT.
3. Incorrectly held that the assessee had a closing balance of bad debts and was eligible for the deduction.
4. Failed to consider the clarificatory provision in Explanation 2 of clause (vii) of Section 36(1).
5. Overlooked that the assessee claimed a higher provision in the P&L account without furnishing details.
6. No additional deduction towards provision other than that mentioned in clause (viia) is available.
7. Allowed further deduction wrongly.
8. The issue for AY 2009-10 was still pending before the ITAT.

Tribunal's Analysis:
- The CIT(A) allowed the deduction after considering the facts and figures, stating that the assessee was eligible for the deduction of 7.5% of total income and 10% of aggregate average advances made by rural branches.
- The Tribunal noted that the figures and claims were presented for the first time before the CIT(A) and were not verified by the Assessing Officer.
- The Tribunal decided to restore the issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination, ensuring proper verification of facts and figures.

Issue 2: Disallowance of Rs. 12,73,60,121 on Account of Salary Arrears

Background:
The assessee claimed a deduction for salary arrears pertaining to the period from 1.11.2007 to 31.3.2009, which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A).

Tribunal's Analysis:
- The liability for salary arrears arose from proceedings dated 24.7.2010, which was after the closure of the assessment year 2010-11.
- The liability neither arose nor was discharged during the year under consideration.
- The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, confirming the disallowance of the provision made for salary arrears.

Conclusion:
- The Revenue's appeal (ITA No.51/Hyd/2015) is allowed for statistical purposes, with the issue of deduction under Section 36(1)(viia) remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination.
- The assessee's appeal (ITA No.88/Hyd/2015) is dismissed, upholding the disallowance of salary arrears.

Order Pronounced:
The judgment was pronounced on 10th April, 2015.

---