Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (5) TMI 363 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court overturns Tribunal decision, directs reevaluation of family trust application under Section 12AA The Court held that the Tribunal erred in allowing the appeal of the family-run trust without remanding the matter for fresh enquiry. The Commissioner has ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Court overturns Tribunal decision, directs reevaluation of family trust application under Section 12AA

                          The Court held that the Tribunal erred in allowing the appeal of the family-run trust without remanding the matter for fresh enquiry. The Commissioner has the authority to examine the genuineness of the trust's activities and objects under Section 12AA. The Tribunal should have sent the case back for further investigation as requested information was not provided by the trust. The Tribunal's decision was set aside, directing the Commissioner to reevaluate the trust's application under Section 12AA promptly, considering the material that can be submitted by the trust.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the ITAT was correct in allowing the appeal of the assessee despite the family-run trust not submitting details of assets and properties.
                          2. Whether the ITAT was right in not upholding the findings of CIT under Section 12AA(1)(b)(ii) considering the assessee's failure to comply with Section 12AA(1)(a).

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. ITAT's Decision on Appeal Despite Non-Submission of Asset Details:

                          The core issue revolves around whether the ITAT was justified in allowing the appeal of the respondent-Society, which is a family-run trust, despite it not submitting the necessary details of its assets and properties. The Commissioner had rejected the Society's application for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the grounds that the Society failed to prove its charitable nature and did not provide fresh evidence of free subsidized education for the poor or any element of public benefit. Additionally, the Commissioner noted that the land and building were leased from the daughter of the General Secretary, and complete details of the land and buildings were not furnished. The Tribunal, however, directed the Commissioner to grant registration, which was contested by the Revenue.

                          2. ITAT's Non-Upholding of CIT's Findings under Section 12AA(1)(b)(ii):

                          The second issue concerns whether the ITAT erred in not upholding the CIT's findings under Section 12AA(1)(b)(ii), given that the assessee had not complied with the provisions of Section 12AA(1)(a). The CIT had found that the Society did not provide the necessary documents and information to prove the genuineness of its activities and objects. The Tribunal's decision to allow the appeal without remanding the matter for fresh enquiry was challenged by the Revenue, who argued that the Commissioner should have the opportunity to satisfy himself of the objects and genuineness of the Society's activities.

                          Tribunal's Reliance on Legal Precedents:

                          The Tribunal placed heavy reliance on the judgment in Pinegrove International Charitable Trust Vs. Union of India & others, which was upheld by the Supreme Court in M/s Queen's Educational Society Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax. However, it was noted that a Division Bench in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Surya Educational & Charitable Trust held that the principles for excluding income under Section 10(23C) are not applicable when considering an application for registration under Section 12AA. The genuineness of the objects of the trust must be examined, not the income.

                          Court's Conclusion:

                          The Court concluded that the Tribunal was not justified in allowing the appeal and issuing the necessary direction without remanding the matter for fresh enquiry. The Commissioner has the power to look into the genuineness of the activities and objects of the trust under Section 12AA. The Tribunal should have sent the matter back to the Commissioner for fresh enquiry, considering the additional information that was requested but not provided by the respondent-Society.

                          Final Judgment:

                          The order of the Tribunal dated 19.02.2013 was set aside. The Commissioner was directed to decide the application filed under Section 12AA afresh, considering the material that can be produced by the respondent-assessee. The application should be decided expeditiously, given that it was filed more than three years ago. The appeal was allowed with these observations.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found