Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner company's proposed reduction of paid-up share capital should be confirmed and whether compliance with the statutory procedure could be dispensed with in the absence of creditors.
Analysis: The petition sought confirmation of reduction of share capital under Section 100(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rules 46 and 47 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. The company had not commenced business, had no secured or unsecured creditors, and the Regional Director raised no objection. In these circumstances, the requirement of following the procedure under Section 101(2) was dispensed with. The reduction was approved by a unanimous board resolution and a special resolution of the shareholders, and the proposed reduction was found not to prejudice any creditor or stakeholder.
Conclusion: The proposed reduction of share capital was approved and the form of minutes was also approved.
Final Conclusion: The petition was allowed and the reduction of the company's paid-up share capital stood confirmed with consequential directions for registration and publication.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a company has not commenced business, has no creditors, and the proposed reduction of share capital does not prejudice any stakeholder, the Court may confirm the reduction and dispense with the procedural requirement under Section 101(2) of the Companies Act, 1956.