Consideration for slump sale not taxable under Income-tax Act. Appeals dismissed, cross-objections not maintainable.

The court affirmed that the consideration amount received for a slump sale of a going concern should not be taxed under section 50 of the Income-tax Act, even if the assessee retained some company assets post-sale. The court held that the transaction qualified as a slump sale, dismissing the Revenue's appeals. Additionally, the court ruled that cross-objections filed by the assessee were not maintainable under section 260A of the Act, based on precedent, leading to the dismissal of both appeals and cross-objections.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. Whether the consideration amount received by the assessee for a slump sale of a going concern should be taxed under section 50 of the Act when the assessee retained some company assets.

Detailed Analysis:
The Revenue filed appeals against the Tribunal's order affirming that the sale was a slump sale and capital gains should be computed accordingly. The substantial question of law was whether the consideration amount of Rs. 2.2 crores received by the assessee was for a slump sale and not taxable under section 50 of the Act, considering the assessee still owned some company assets post-sale. The assessee transferred part of its business to another company and did not offer the consideration received to tax. The assessing authority found that not all assets were sold, leading to the conclusion that it was not a slump sale. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals-I) held it was a slump sale based on similar cases and judgments. The Tribunal also affirmed this decision, citing precedents and apex court rulings. The appeals were dismissed as both appellate courts concluded it was a slump sale based on the entire material on record and previous judgments.

2. Whether cross-objections filed by the assessee are maintainable under section 260A of the Income-tax Act.

Detailed Analysis:
The assessee filed cross-objections, but the court held that cross-objections were not maintainable under section 260A of the Income-tax Act based on a previous judgment. The court dismissed the cross-objections following the ruling that cross-objections are not permissible under the mentioned section. As a result, both the appeals and cross-objections were dismissed, along with any pending applications.

---