Company granted deposit repayment extension post Companies Act, 2013, with monitoring to ensure compliance.

The Board granted the Applicant Company a six-month extension to clear deposits due for repayment, acknowledging financial constraints post the Companies Act, 2013. A Hardship Committee was constituted to monitor the repayment process, emphasizing adherence to legislative intent and prohibiting the use of earmarked liquid assets for repayments. The Board outlined conditions for deposit repayment, time extensions, and monitoring mechanisms to ensure compliance with the Companies Act, 2013, ultimately disposing of the case.

---

---

Issues:
1. Exemption from maintaining liquid assets under Rule 3A of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rule, 1975/Rule 13 of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014.
2. Utilization of funds for repayment of outstanding deposits.
3. Repayment of existing deposits in accordance with original terms.
4. Time extension for clearing deposits due for repayment.
5. Difficulty in repayment due to financial constraints.
6. Company's efforts to repay deposits.
7. Extension of time for compliance with Section 74(1) of the Companies Act, 2013.
8. Constitution of a Hardship Committee to monitor the repayment process.
9. Exemption from maintaining liquid assets under Rule 3A of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rule, 1975.

Detailed Analysis:

1. The Applicant Company sought exemption from maintaining liquid assets under the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules and permission to utilize funds for repayment of outstanding deposits. They also requested permission to repay existing deposits as per original terms and sought an extension of time to clear all due deposits. The company faced challenges due to the cessation of accepting deposits post the Companies Act, 2013, affecting its financial liquidity.

2. The Company, a multi-activity entity with a substantial turnover, had been accepting deposits for years and maintained a good repayment record. However, the new Act's provisions necessitated the repayment of all deposits within a specified period, creating financial strain. Despite efforts to repay, the company faced difficulties due to the halt in accepting deposits, impacting its cash flow.

3. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs empowered the Company Law Board to address such applications under Section 74(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. The company's application highlighted the challenges in repaying deposits and the steps taken to address the situation, including divesting assets and seeking loans for repayment.

4. The Company requested a time extension to clear deposits, citing practical difficulties in repaying the entire amount by the specified deadline. The Board acknowledged the company's financial constraints and granted a six-month extension for complying with the Act's requirements regarding maturing fixed deposits.

5. The Board also constituted a Hardship Committee to oversee the repayment process, requiring progress reports at regular intervals. Failure to adhere to the repayment terms would prompt the Committee to report to the Board promptly.

6. The Board, while granting the time extension, emphasized the importance of adhering to the legislation's intent and directed the company to repay pending deposits promptly. Additionally, the company was not permitted to utilize earmarked liquid assets for deposit repayment, ensuring compliance with regulatory guidelines.

7. In conclusion, the Board disposed of the case, outlining the conditions for the company to fulfill regarding deposit repayment, time extensions, and monitoring mechanisms to ensure compliance with the Companies Act, 2013.

---