TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Assessee Prevails in Tax Relief Interpretation Case: New Units Qualify as Industrial Undertakings</h1> The Tribunal and High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in interpreting relief under section 84 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for specific assessment ... Bonus, Business Expenditure, New Industrial Undertaking Issues involved: 1. Interpretation of relief under section 84 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for specific assessment years.2. Determination of deductibility of a sum as revenue expenditure for computing income for a particular assessment year.Interpretation of relief under section 84:The Tribunal considered whether the assessee was entitled to relief under section 84 for the assessment years 1963-64, 1965-66, 1966-67, and 1967-68. The Income-tax Officer initially rejected the claim, stating that the new units were not 'newly established industrial undertakings.' However, the Tribunal found that the units met the criteria under section 84, considering factors such as government approvals, separate technical service agreements, distinct locations, separate records, and workforce. The Tribunal's decision was based on a circular emphasizing the need for a case-by-case assessment. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, noting the substantial increase in output and capital, and the absence of legal flaws.Deductibility of sum as revenue expenditure:Regarding the second issue, the Tribunal examined whether a sum of Rs. 358,000 could be deducted as revenue expenditure for the assessment year 1966-67. The assessee had made a provision for bonus payment in its accounts after the statutory liability arose. The Tribunal acknowledged the undisputed liability and allowed the deduction based on actuarial valuation principles. The High Court concurred with this decision, citing established legal principles. Consequently, both questions were answered in favor of the assessee, with no costs awarded.Separate Judgment: The judgment was delivered by Justice S. C. Sen, with Chief Justice Satish Chandra concurring.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
