Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount paid to trustees for providing pension to the employee and, after his death, to his widow was expenditure laid out or expended wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the assessee's business and therefore admissible as a business deduction.
Analysis: The assessee had arranged pensionary benefits for a long-serving and key employee from the inception of his service, and the arrangement was later expanded to include a pension for the widow in specified contingencies. The facts found by the fact-finding authorities showed that the employee expected such pensionary benefit, that the arrangement was linked to his service and responsibilities, and that the payment was made on grounds of commercial expediency to secure loyal and efficient service and to facilitate the carrying on of the business. The provision for the widow was treated as part of the same commercial arrangement and not as an independent or extraneous payment. The Court also accepted that legitimate business needs must be judged from the standpoint of prudent business judgment and that pensionary benefits to dependants are not inherently outside the scope of business expenditure.
Conclusion: The expenditure was held to be laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the assessee's business and was allowable as a deduction.