Motor vehicle tariff classification may require statutory vehicle standards and expert technical examination before a final finding is made.

Motor vehicle tariff classification under Chapter 87 turned on technical features such as seating capacity, vehicle design and statutory specifications. The commentary notes that the tariff descriptions under Headings 87.02 and 87.03 may be read in pari materia with the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Maharashtra Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 to understand the relevant standards. Where the record contains conflicting material and the available certificates rely mainly on declarations rather than objective testing, a final classification finding cannot safely be made. In such circumstances, fresh adjudication with expert technical examination is warranted, and the substantive classification issue remains open.

---

---

Issues: Whether the disputed motor vehicles were classifiable under Heading 87.02 as vehicles designed for transport of ten or more persons including the driver, or under Heading 87.03, and whether the classification controversy required fresh adjudication with technical assistance.

Analysis: The tariff entries under Chapter 87 and the corresponding motor vehicle classifications were treated as operating in pari materia, so the standards and definitions in the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Maharashtra Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 could be used to understand the tariff description. The record showed conflicting material on seating capacity, seat dimensions, gross vehicle weight, and the treatment of the vehicle by transport authorities and ARAI. The available certificates were found to rest largely on declarations rather than objective testing against statutory norms. In the absence of expert examination of the vehicle design and the relevant technical standards, a final classification finding could not safely be recorded.

Conclusion: The classification dispute was not finally determined on merits and had to be remitted for fresh consideration with expert assistance.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded to the extent that the matter was sent back for de novo adjudication, with all substantive issues kept open.

Ratio Decidendi: Where tariff classification of a motor vehicle depends on technical criteria such as seating capacity and vehicle design, statutory motor vehicle standards may be consulted, and if the existing record is insufficient for a safe merits determination, remand for expert examination is warranted.

---