Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 on the footing that the firm in which he was a partner was an industrial undertaking within the Explanation to section 5(1)(xxxi) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
Analysis: The exemption under section 5(1)(xxxii) depended on the firm satisfying the definition of an industrial undertaking in the Explanation to section 5(1)(xxxi). The finding recorded was that the firm was engaged in manufacturing ice and in processing potatoes kept in cold storage. The statutory expression "processing of goods" was treated as distinct from manufacture and as wide enough to cover adaptation of goods for a particular purpose. On that footing, the firm answered the description of an industrial undertaking.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the exemption, and the answer to the reference was in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee.