TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Grants Appeal for Input Service Credit on Gardening & House-keeping Essential for Statutory Compliance</h1> <h3>M/s. Caress Beauty Care Products Pvt Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-III</h3> M/s. Caress Beauty Care Products Pvt Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-III - TMI Issues:- Disallowance of cenvat credit on gardening and house-keeping services- Eligibility of input service credit for gardening and house-keeping servicesAnalysis:The case involved a dispute regarding the disallowance of cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 97,391 on gardening and house-keeping services by the adjudicating authority. The Commissioner (Appeals) partially allowed the appeal, permitting input service credit on certain services related to production but disallowing credit on gardening and house-keeping services. The appellant, a manufacturer of shampoo and cold cream, argued that maintaining green cover in their factory area was essential as per statutory requirements, justifying the eligibility for input service credit. The appellant cited relevant laws and relied on case laws to support their claim.The Revenue, represented by the Ld. AR, contended that gardening is not an input service for the manufacture of excisable goods, referencing a Tribunal Order disallowing credit on similar services. The Tribunal analyzed the submissions from both sides and focused on determining the eligibility of the appellant for availing input service credit on gardening and house-keeping services. It noted the statutory requirement for the appellant to maintain green cover and cleanliness in their manufacturing premises, as mandated by Pollution Control and Drug Control Acts. The Tribunal found the appellant's argument supported by the case law cited, which emphasized the necessity of maintaining green cover for compliance with the law.In contrast, the case law cited by the Revenue was deemed inapplicable to the present situation. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant met the criteria for availing credit on gardening and house-keeping services, as these activities were essential for complying with statutory obligations. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the stay petition was disposed of in favor of the appellant. The judgment highlighted the importance of statutory compliance and the relevance of input service credit in specific manufacturing contexts.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
