Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned assessment orders were liable to be set aside for want of personal hearing under Section 22(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act and for being passed before the time granted to the assessee had expired.
Analysis: The petitioner had specifically sought a personal hearing after receiving the relevant materials and also sought further time to reply. The authority nevertheless passed the final orders before the expiry of the extended time and without granting the requested hearing. The requirement of personal hearing under Section 22(4) was treated as mandatory, and the denial of that opportunity amounted to violation of natural justice. The prior grant of documents and opportunity to submit written objections did not cure the defect, because a personal hearing was still required before finalising the matter.
Conclusion: The impugned orders could not be sustained and were set aside. The petitioner was directed to appear before the authority on the specified date and the authority was directed to afford personal hearing and pass fresh orders in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute mandates personal hearing, an assessment order passed without granting that hearing and before the expiry of the time granted for response is vitiated for breach of natural justice.