Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on cement and steel used in the construction of silos intended for storage of cement and raw materials in the course of manufacture.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the silos formed part of the manufacturing set-up so that the inputs used for their construction could qualify for credit. The construction materials were used to create storage facilities for cement and raw materials within the continuous manufacturing process. The Tribunal relied on binding Karnataka High Court decisions holding that credit cannot be denied merely because the item constructed is embedded to earth or is an immovable structure, where the inputs are used for a functional plant component connected with manufacture. The contrary reliance on cases relating to tower parts and prefabricated buildings was held inapplicable on facts.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on cement and steel used for construction of silos was admissible and the disallowance was unsustainable.