Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the issue of equity shares by the assessee to its non-resident associated enterprise attracted Chapter X of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and justified a transfer pricing adjustment on the alleged shortfall in share premium.
Analysis: The transfer pricing machinery under Chapter X applies only where an international transaction gives rise to income that is chargeable to tax under the Act. The issue of equity shares is a transaction on capital account and, by itself, does not generate income. A shortfall between the issue price and any notional fair market value of the shares cannot be treated as income in the absence of a charging provision covering such capital receipt. The arm's length price mechanism cannot be used to create a tax charge where none exists under the substantive provisions of the Act.
Conclusion: The issue of equity shares to the non-resident associated enterprise did not attract Chapter X, and the transfer pricing adjustment was not sustainable. The finding is in favour of the assessee.