Court denies co-op society's tax exemption claim under section 80P(2)(e) for income not meeting godown use criteria.

The court ruled against the co-operative society, denying the exemption claimed under section 80P(2)(e) of the Income-tax Act. The income in question, derived from commission and reimbursement of transport charges, did not meet the criteria of income arising from letting out or use of godowns or warehouses for storage, processing, or marketing of commodities as required by the provision. The court emphasized the necessity for a direct connection between the income and the letting out or use of such facilities to qualify for the exemption.

---

---

Issues: Exemption under section 80P(2)(e) of the Income-tax Act for a co-operative society's income derived from letting of godowns or warehouses.

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the exemption claimed by a co-operative society under section 80P(2)(e) for its income of Rs. 1,20,206. The society claimed the amount as commission received for procurement of paddy and rice and reimbursement of transport charges from a corporation. However, the Income-tax Officer denied the exemption, stating that the income did not arise from letting of godowns or warehouses for storage, processing, or facilitating marketing of commodities, as required by section 80P(2)(e). The Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal upheld this decision (Para. 1-3).

The court analyzed section 80P(2)(e), emphasizing that the exemption applies to income derived by a co-operative society from letting out its godowns or warehouses for specific purposes related to commodities. The court discussed differing interpretations by various High Courts, noting that the income must be connected to the letting out or use of godowns or warehouses to qualify for the exemption under clause (e) (Para. 4-5).

The Tribunal's finding that the assessee did not earn any income from letting out godowns or warehouses for storage, processing, or marketing of commodities led the court to reject the claim for exemption under section 80P(2)(e). The court concluded that the income must be directly related to the letting out or use of godowns or warehouses to qualify for the exemption, which was not the case here (Para. 6-7).

Therefore, the court answered the referred question in the affirmative, ruling against the assessee and denying the exemption claimed under section 80P(2)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Para. 8).

---