Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (4) TMI 6 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules on commercial area restrictions & built-up area definitions for residential projects The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the restriction on commercial area and the definition of 'built-up area' do not apply ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal rules on commercial area restrictions & built-up area definitions for residential projects

                          The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the restriction on commercial area and the definition of "built-up area" do not apply retrospectively to projects commenced before specific dates. The Tribunal also determined that proportionate deductions should be allowed for eligible residential units, even if some units exceed prescribed built-up area limits. The Assessing Officer was directed to re-compute the deduction for the assessee under section 80-IB(10) based on these rulings, resulting in the partial allowance of the assessee's appeals.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Eligibility for deduction under section 80-IB(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for housing projects with commercial areas.
                          2. Applicability of the definition of "built-up area" for projects commenced before 1.4.2005.
                          3. Proportionate deduction for projects with some non-eligible residential units.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Eligibility for Deduction Under Section 80-IB(10):
                          The primary issue revolves around the eligibility of the assessee for deductions under section 80-IB(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for two housing projects: DSK Vishwa III and DSK Frangipani. The deductions were denied by the Assessing Officer (AO) on the grounds that the projects did not meet the conditions prescribed under section 80-IB(10).

                          For DSK Vishwa III, the AO noted that the project included commercial areas (6132 sq.ft.), which exceeded the limits prescribed by clause (d) of section 80-IB(10). The assessee argued that the amendment introducing this restriction was effective from 1.4.2005 and should not apply retrospectively to their project, which commenced on 13.10.2000. The Tribunal upheld this view, citing the Bombay High Court's decision in CIT v Brahma Associates, which held that the amendment is prospective and not applicable to projects commenced before 1.4.2005.

                          For DSK Frangipani, the AO's objection was that the built-up area of some flats exceeded the 1500 sq.ft. limit prescribed in clause (c) of section 80-IB(10). The Tribunal found that the AO included balconies, terraces, and car parking areas in the built-up area calculation, which was incorrect for projects commenced before 1.4.2005. The Tribunal referred to the Development Control Rules of the local authority, which did not include these areas in the built-up area, and thus ruled in favor of the assessee.

                          2. Applicability of the Definition of "Built-Up Area":
                          The Tribunal addressed the issue of whether the definition of "built-up area," which includes balconies and terraces and was introduced by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, effective from 1.4.2005, applies to projects commenced before this date. The Tribunal concluded that this definition does not apply retrospectively. For projects like DSK Frangipani, which commenced on 12.12.2003, the built-up area should be calculated according to the Development Control Rules of the local authority, which exclude balconies and terraces.

                          3. Proportionate Deduction for Projects with Some Non-Eligible Residential Units:
                          The Tribunal also considered whether the presence of some non-eligible residential units (those exceeding 1500 sq.ft. in built-up area) in a project should result in the denial of the entire deduction under section 80-IB(10). The Tribunal ruled that the deduction should be proportionate, allowing for eligible units while denying it for non-eligible ones. This decision was based on precedents, including the Mumbai Bench's ruling in M/s. Ekta Housing Pvt. Ltd., which allowed for proportionate deductions in similar circumstances.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on several grounds:
                          - The restriction on commercial area introduced by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004, does not apply retrospectively to projects commenced before 1.4.2005.
                          - The definition of "built-up area" including balconies and terraces, applicable from 1.4.2005, does not apply to projects commenced before this date.
                          - Proportionate deductions under section 80-IB(10) should be allowed for eligible residential units, even if some units exceed the prescribed built-up area limits.

                          The Tribunal directed the AO to re-compute the deduction allowable to the assessee under section 80-IB(10) based on these findings. The appeals of the assessee were partly allowed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found