Exemption for technology transfer payments upheld at interim stage despite delayed cess payment, supporting waiver of predeposit.

Delay in payment of research and development cess, by itself, was treated as insufficient to deny exemption under Notification No. 18/2002-ST where the cess had in fact been paid and no objection was raised by the administering authority. On that basis, the appellant was found to have a prima facie case for waiver of predeposit in a service tax dispute involving transfer of technology payments to overseas service providers. The remaining portion of the demand was considered to depend on evidence and was regarded as debatable at the interim stage, so recovery of the adjudged dues was stayed during pendency of the appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery in respect of the service tax demand, including the denial of exemption under Notification No. 18/2002-ST on account of payment of research and development cess after payment to the foreign service provider.

Analysis: The major part of the demand arose from denial of the exemption linked to transfer of technology payments made to overseas service providers. The disputed exemption was refused only because the research and development cess under section 3 of the Research and Development Cess Act, 1986 was paid after the foreign remittance. The Tribunal noted that the same issue had already been considered in earlier precedent, where delay in payment of cess was held not to be a ground for denying the exemption once the cess had in fact been paid. The remaining demand was found to rest on appreciation of evidence and was debatable at the prima facie stage.

Conclusion: The appellant established a prima facie case for waiver of predeposit. Recovery of the adjudged dues was stayed during the pendency of the appeal, and the stay petition was allowed.

Ratio Decidendi: Delay in payment of research and development cess, by itself, does not justify denial of exemption under the relevant notification when the cess has been paid and there is no objection from the administering authority; at the interim stage, such a claim supports waiver of predeposit.

---