Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the receipts claimed as reimbursement of expenses were proved to be mere reimbursements, and if not, whether the income was nevertheless liable to be computed under section 44BB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee failed to produce primary and contemporaneous evidence showing actual incurring of the claimed expenses, the manner of allocation, or a reliable one-to-one nexus between the expenditure and the amounts recovered from the associated enterprise. The debit notes and broad policy documents were found insufficient by themselves to discharge the burden of proof. Earlier year orders did not govern the present year because each assessment year must be decided on its own facts, and the record in the year under appeal did not establish the reimbursement claim. In the circumstances, the receipts could not be accepted as proved reimbursements, but, given the nature of the business and the services connected with mineral oil operations, the proper course was to apply section 44BB.
Conclusion: The assessee's claim of pure reimbursement was rejected, but the receipts were directed to be assessed under section 44BB.